<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Music Hall: a delicate balanceWhat to preserve? What to enhance?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.expresscincinnati.com/exp-commentary/music-hall-a-delicate-balancewhat-to-preserve-what-to-enhance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.expresscincinnati.com/exp-commentary/music-hall-a-delicate-balancewhat-to-preserve-what-to-enhance/</link>
	<description>showcasing Cincinnati&#039;s creative arts &#38; generous spirit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:46:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gibson60</title>
		<link>http://www.expresscincinnati.com/exp-commentary/music-hall-a-delicate-balancewhat-to-preserve-what-to-enhance/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>gibson60</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.expresscincinnati.com/?p=350#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Express deserves applause for Thom Mariner&#039;s timely column on the future of Music Hall. It&#039;s a well-organized and easy-to-understand rundown of an extremely complicated and important issue. The column needs to be read by anyone who cares about Greater Cincinnati – arts fan or not – and I hope that happens. 

Many of us remember in the 1960s, when conservative Cincinnati confronted a high-stakes, far-reaching choice about the need for a new sports stadium on the riverfront. Since then, it seems that every generation has had to face the same fundamental question: do we want to remain a &quot;big league&quot; city? Do we, and can we, try to keep pace with &quot;large market&quot; cities when they raise the ante with bigger and better arenas, stadiums and performance venues?

Factor in our aesthetic, civic and historic responsibility to maintain Music Hall – our &quot;secular cathedral,&quot; as Thom so aptly put it – and things get REALLY complicated!

Today&#039;s harsh economy underscores the fact that there are plenty of worthwhile ways to spend our money. But the discussion has to start somewhere and must include Music Hall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Express deserves applause for Thom Mariner&#8217;s timely column on the future of Music Hall. It&#8217;s a well-organized and easy-to-understand rundown of an extremely complicated and important issue. The column needs to be read by anyone who cares about Greater Cincinnati – arts fan or not – and I hope that happens. </p>
<p>Many of us remember in the 1960s, when conservative Cincinnati confronted a high-stakes, far-reaching choice about the need for a new sports stadium on the riverfront. Since then, it seems that every generation has had to face the same fundamental question: do we want to remain a &#8220;big league&#8221; city? Do we, and can we, try to keep pace with &#8220;large market&#8221; cities when they raise the ante with bigger and better arenas, stadiums and performance venues?</p>
<p>Factor in our aesthetic, civic and historic responsibility to maintain Music Hall – our &#8220;secular cathedral,&#8221; as Thom so aptly put it – and things get REALLY complicated!</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s harsh economy underscores the fact that there are plenty of worthwhile ways to spend our money. But the discussion has to start somewhere and must include Music Hall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

